Thursday, December 11
Wednesday, November 26
Be sure to read the whole thing, (I got it over at Daily Kos), but I'll just quote a little from the press pool report from this afternoon:
The First Family-to-be were positioned at the start of the food line; their job was to hand out white plastic bags filled with fresh chicken. Recipients then moved down the line to receive bags of potatoes, apples, loaves of bread and large boxes of staples including macaroni and cheese, tomato sauce, peanut butter, canned corn, oatmeal, Miracle Whip, mixed fruit and other items.
Obama called out: "We're ready, let's go, bring 'em on in," and the distribution began.
Clearly, those lining up for food hadn't been told they had an importangt guest helping out. this day. Many of them lit up; some shrieked with delight and hugged one or more of the Obamas. One elderly woman bowed; all seemed very appreciative. One and all were greeted with handshakes, hugs, and hearty "Happy Thanksgivings."
The daughters behaved like troopers for a half hour or so before the cold caught up with them, and they retired for a few minutes to warm up.
One sixty-something neighborhood resident named Daryel Namdan was asked how it felt to have Obama there. "It makes me feel very special," he said, before choking up.
After shaking hands with the food bank volunteers, he [Obama] came over to the pool and had this to say:
"The number of people who are getting food this year is up 33%. It gives a sense times are tough - and I think that on Thanksgiving it's importat [sic] for us tpo [sic] remember there's a need for support.
"These folks were already oftentimes having a tough time, and it gets tougher now." He encouraged all Americans of means to help out however they could. "This is part of what Thanksgiving should be all about," he said.
Asked why he'd brought his daughters along, he replied: "I want them to learn the importance of how fortunate they are and to make sure they're giving back."
I mean, think about it. Can you even *imagine* any of our Republican presidents (or the nominees) from the last two decades doing this?
Thursday, November 20
The short version is that I have a medical problem which put me out of commission for the better part of six weeks. The good news is that I now have a definitive diagnosis and know exactly what the problem is and how to treat it. The bad news is that the problem requires at least two surgeries (one of which is done, the 2nd of which is scheduled for early October) and when it's all said and done, I may be left with only one kidney.
That said, I am doing surprisingly well given the circumstances; still doing music and photography while I try to figure out what's coming next.
For those of you interested in the photography end of things, I've decided to start selling prints of some of my works. You can see the whole list at:
In addition, I can do up pretty much any of the light drawings in all sorts of sizes. Please feel free to drop me an e-mail (email@example.com) if you're interested in purchasing one.
Hope everyone is well. I know I will be soon enough, but in the meantime, I'm doing my best to keep up with everything.
More info: http://juliewaters.com/
Julie's photography: http://juliesmagiclightshow.com/
Upcoming events for Julie Waters
Sunday, December 14th 2nd Sundays Song Circle (tentative) at RAMP Gallery; Bellows Falls, VT
Sunday, January 11th 2nd Sundays Song Circle (tentative) at RAMP Gallery; Bellows Falls, VT
Monday, November 17
As some of you know, I've been into birding for some time, and photography for a bit longer. Now that the election is (mostly) over, I'm going to do another one of those diaries where I share some of my favorite bird photos and talk a little bit about the photos themselves. There will probably be some overlap here, as some of my favorites I've probably discussed before.
I'm going to start with the one showed: a Ruby-Throated Hummingbird feeding off of a bleeding heart.
This is a different version of this photo than I've shown before: it's a wider shot, as I've found a nice way to present it as a gallery work (10"x15"), but I think it works nicely.
This shot was a combination of preparation and dumb luck. I had been mowing the lawn all morning and was exhausted. I sat down on the porch, really unable to do much of any damned thing, but I did have my camera with me (when I mow, I set it up on a tripod, near the feeders so if I spot something interesting, I can take a break and check it out).
So suddenly I see this flicker of motion and realize what it is. One of the hummingbirds has swung over to the front yard. They love the bee balm plants, but I'd never seen one go after the bleeding heart. I grabbed the camera, took as many shots as I could, and... well, wow.
This next photo I haven't shared here before, I don't think, though it's one of my favorites. Snow geese sometimes populate the Dead Creek Wildlife Management Area in Western Vermont. I had often tried to get photos of them, but it was always from a great distance. This particular day, I'd had a morning meeting in Burlington and had the rest of the day to myself. I decided to go the long way home and swing by Dead Creek (it takes me an extra two hours or so). When I got there, there were no Snow Geese to be found, and suddenly I spotted these ones on a nearby field. I pulled over, grabbed the camera and started to take pictures. They were all on the ground at that point. Sometimes I will take a photo, edge a little closer, take a few more, etc., which is what I did in this particular case. Eventually, I made the mistake of getting a little two close. The entire flock started to take off and then started flying in circles, more or less surrounding me. It ended up with me getting this photo:
While I love this shot (and when you see it blown up, you get some incredible textures), I think I like it even better like this:
It seems to come down to 1/3rd preferring the b&w to the color and 2/3rds preferring the color.
This hummingbird shot, though, is one of my favorites as well:
It's a very lucky shot. I had the camera pointed at the feeders to see if any cool looking hummingbirds showed up, but I'd rarely seen two at once. Once I realized there were two of them the trick wasn't getting *close* enough. It was zooming out quickly enough that I'd get them both in the same shot. I managed to pull it off, just as they hit the dive bombing position.
This Rufous Hummingbird:
was a real joy to photograph. I'd never seen one of these before (we really only get the ruby-throated hummingbirds in New England), but in November of 2007, we got word that one was hanging out at a feeder in Westmoreland, NH. Westmoreland isn't that far from where I live (and we've traveled a lot further to find rare birds) so we figured we'd check it out. It was on someone's property, which is always dicey, but this woman had given permission for people to stop by her porch and hang out to look at it. She was really into it, too, it turned out. She came out to say hello and asked us to make sure we sign her guestbook.
But the best part was that it took *minutes* before we saw the bird. She had hummingbird feeders all over the area, and the porch looked out on several of them, so we figured, well, we'll get a decent look and maybe I can get a nice photo from here.
But no, the rufous was interested in the feeder *on the porch*. The one that was only about eight feet away. So we sat there for about half an hour watching it come and go while I photographed it, figuring out *just* how close I could get where it would use the feeders without being so close I'd scare it off (turns out about 6'6" is about the magic distance) and voila, instant life bird.
Speaking of traveling to find birds... this January was our first big birding trip. We went to Bosque Del Apache Wildlife Refuge in New Mexico, and had a real trip finding all sorts of new birds. But the real treat was the Sandhill Cranes. This shot in particular:
is one of my favorites from the trip. There's something wonderful about that moment just before flight; all that energy built up and ready to go, at that moment where the bird transfers from awkward and gangly to magnificent in flight.
I will also say something else about snow geese here. I mentioned before getting to see Snow Geese at Dead Creek. Seeing them at Bosque is a whole different ball game. If you get to the viewing platform before dawn, you can be part of probably the most amazing thing I've ever experienced as a birder.
There is this large body of water where many of the birds roost all night (roosting in water makes them much less vulnerable to predators, such as coyotes, which *will* try to get their paws on the geese and the cranes). If you get there at the right time, you will see the ones gathered in the water, plus all the other geese gathering in to join them. It's *thousands* of snow geese, coming together in the middle of this pond, making all sorts of racket. This can go on for an hour; sometimes more; sometimes less.
But then there is this point where all of a sudden (and there is *no* time to prepare for this) it gets *silent*. This lasts about as much time as you have to breathe in and then out again and everything else is just dead quiet.
...the geese take off. For about five seconds, all you hear is wings. It's loud enough to sound like a tornado going directly over your head. The first time you experience it, it's like nothing you've ever been through before. The second time you think you've already seen it once so you're prepared for it. You're wrong. It's every bit as intense.
There's something about being surrounded by birds that just makes my heart leap. I hope writing this up has been nice for some of you as well.
For those of you who enjoyed these photos, you can see tons more at juliewaters.com
As usual, feel free to use this as an open birds and birding thread and post your own photos.
Tuesday, November 11
Many of you have heard reports about the coming Republican Civil War, which I will henceforth be referred to as THE WAR TO END ALL REPUBLICANS ("WEAR," for short)
But most of this has been discussed merely as a split between the camps of John Sidney McCain and Sarah Louise Heath Palin, specifically focusing on matters of the approach to the campaign.
But, in reality, there are several factions competing for the "soul" of the Republican Party, or at least the closest thing to a soul the party could dig out of a deep, dark, recess that's best not described in polite company.
So I've written up this handy little guide to help us all better understand who the various factions in the Republican party are, and what sides we can expect them to be taking in the upcoming WEAR.
First, let's start with the obvious broad categories:
Their likes are deregulation, tax breaks for the wealthy, making a lot of money no matter who or what it hurts, complete lack of accountability and offshore accounts to hide certain kinds of profits from the IRS.
Their dislikes are corporate responsibility, people who write them letters and anyone who attempts to regulate any aspect of their business.
They favor Republicans because Republicans are eager and willing to take large donations and, in turn, just sort of look the other way when they, I dunno, don't bother paying taxes on public property for forty years.
*RELIGIOUS/"FAMILY VALUES" NUTCASES*
Their likes are smug superiority, people like them, amendments banning same-sex marriage, the death penalty, gays who attack other gays and the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Their dislikes are gays, Muslims, people who look like Muslims, people who aren't like them, people who dare to criticize them, elitists, vegetarians, Wiccans, abortion, people who are sane Christians, people who act too Jewish, gay or catholic.
They favor Republicans because they think Republicans will eventually overturn Roe v Wade and because Republicans pretend to like them in exchange for their support.
Their likes are war, violence, and anything which makes them think America is superior.
Their dislikes are France, Europe, France, any country that's not the United States, France, Canada, and peacenicks.
Their likes are anyone who likes war as much as they do, especially if they're dark-skinned enough and crazy-sounding enough to justify us going to war with them. This means *you*, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
They like Republicans because Republicans are consistently thrilled to talk up war and violence, even when it's not in their best interest to do so.
Libertarians like very small government and freedom. They hate excessive spending, big government and waste.
It is often unclear as to why they like Republicans.
Their likes are people who look like them and anyone who helps them justify their bigotry. Their dislikes are *everyone else*.
They like republicans because Republicans make them think they're not really racist.
Their likes are people who say the right kind of thing, regardless of their actions. Their dislikes are anyone who tries to correct their understanding of the world.
They like Republicans because they use catchy buzzwords and because they are idiots.
There are, of course, other categories we could discuss, but these will serve as basic categories for the discussion. There are plenty of people who overlap in this group. John McCain, for example, would fall into the *Warmonger* category, but he'd also fit directly in with *Big Business*. Many of his supporters fall into those categories as well as the *Useful Idiot* category because he can talk a good game about veterans issues, but actually does very poorly with them.
Sarah Palin, on the other hand, fits in easily with *Religious Nutcases*, *Racists* and *Useful Idiots*. In fact, assume that everyone I mention here includes that last group in some capacity from this point on. I'll focus instead on the other two: she's loved by religious nutcases because she *is one* and she's loved by racists because she gave them so much great rhetoric during the campaign so as to make them think that their racism and xenophobia was, on some level, acceptable.
Mitt Romney, on the other hand, is all *Big Business* and *Family Values*. My suspicion about Romney is that he is less someone with convictions then someone who was so sure that he needed to say certain things to get elected that he's actually convinced himself that he believes them. But he's got a strong base of support, just not strong enough that he didn't need to fund his own campaign with a *whole lot* of his own money.
But how about Mike Huckabee? He's clearly loved by the *Religious Nutcases* but seems to be anti-racism, at least in his rhetoric. He's hated by big business but somewhat in the libertarian category, except he believes in universal education. In other words, one of the popular Republican candidates has some campaign issues more in favor with Democrats than Republicans.
Which brings us to Ron Paul, who represents an entirely different aspect of the Republican party, with the vast majority of his support coming from *Libertarians* and *Racists*, and definitely not the religious nutcases nor the warmongers.
With the exception of John McCain, there is a good possibility that all these individuals will be running for President in 2012 and this is where the WEAR comes in.
There are lots of rumors spreading about what happened behind the scenes in the McCain/Palin campaign, which helps set the stage for the upcoming battle. I.e., Romney camp spreading Palin stories?, Palin aide strikes back at McCain camp, etc. Most of you have seen much of this, so I won't bother reiterating.
But this is the basic dynamic: people from the Romney, McCain and Palin factions seem to *really* have it in for one another. Romney's appeal to the Family Values nutcases is damaged by the fact that he's a Mormon and most Family Values nutcases don't like *anyone* who's not a Christian (or, at the very least, an acceptably conservative Jew) and most assuredly do *not* think of Mormonism as "Christian." McCain's people pretty much hate Romney and now they seem to *really* hate Palin. They blame her for having hurt McCain's chances and being an all around crappy candidate and for "going rogue" from time to time. And then there's the whole Palin/underwear thing (which has *nothing* to do with Romney).
But the real gold here is that this scatters those categories I listed above. Libertarians are already finding problems with the Republican party, which has largely *increased* spending during their tenure and made government a *lot* bigger (and a lot more anti-freedom). Big Business will support anyone who helps them out, and turning the economy into a great big sinkhole really doesn't help big business all that much.
The religious nutcases are now split, with some going to Obama and most still preferring Republicans but willing to sit the election out if someone who's not sufficiently evangelical gets nominated. Granted, there are still plenty of racists, and they probably (if possible) like the Republicans a little more than they used to, but probably think of them as weak little sissies if they cooperate on Obama with anything.
So most of what's left for Republicans are useful idiots. And the great thing about useful idiots is that they're stupid enough to start chasing *each other* around with baseball bats rather than *us*. So when big business starts blaming religious nutcases and religious nutcases start blaming warmongers and warmongers start blaming libertarians who, in turn, blame everybody, well, hijinx ensue.
To me, this is going to be sort of like "Glengarry Glen Ross" crossed with a Keystone Cops movie.
Grab your popcorn, folks. This is going to be fun.
Saturday, November 8
The quick summary: the Hogfather has disappeared on Hogswatch Eve. As Death (yes, that Death) explains, if the children do not receive their Hogswatch gifts, they will cease to believe in the Hogfather and "The sun will not rise tomorrow."
So Death takes over for the Hogfather, delivering gifts to all the children, while his granddaughter tries her best to track down the Hogfather and return him to his post.
At one point, she asks Death if it's true that the sun wouldn't rise the next day. He says yes, it's true. When she asks what would happen instead, he explains that merely a flaming ball of gas would illuminate the sky.
This is kind of how I feel about Obama's victory, and I know this is oddly sentimental, especially for me, but there's something about what happened that was, to me, magical. I know that logically there was strategy, planning, and an immense amount of hard work, and I don't mean to discount that.
But when we went to bed Tuesday night, I turned to Cyndi and said "it's a whole new world." I didn't mean that literally, but I meant it in the sense that suddenly everything seems really different.
Racism isn't over, not by a long shot, and we're still in a hell of a mess as far as this country goes, and I mean one hell of a mess. Nothing's changed, really, except we've decided to put someone smart in the white house.
But if things had gone differently, and we'd nominated Edwards (and he hadn't turned out to be a bit of a horndog) and ended up with a President Edwards, I would have been happy. I would have been very pleased.
But I wouldn't have felt like it was a whole new world. I would have just seen the next day as another day with a gaseous ball of fire illuminating the sky.
Now the sun's rising on a whole new world and I'm looking to the future with real optimism for the first time in quite some time.
Friday, November 7
On the local race level, we're fine. I.e., State Senators, State Representatives; I don't see any reason to change the way of doing business. Both parties are doing well in that regard.
Even on some of the statewide races, having both progressives and democrats involved in the races have not been a bad thing. I think Jerry Levy, for example, brought some good issues to the debate about the auditor's race in 2006 and added some interest in it that Salmon didn't. Martha Abbot, if she could get traction, would probably make a very good state treasurer and she brings good ideas into the race.
I think the big problem is the two top tickets: Gov and Lte Gov. I think the problem is twofold: Democrats running terrible candidates (not terrible people, but good people who make lousy candidates) and Progressives running candidates that have no realistic chance of running to the point where they sometimes help Republicans. I think that some form of compromise needs to be arranged between the parties, and I don't think it has to be something that makes everyone happy as long as it's something that everyone can respect as fair and reasonable.
If, for example, both Democrats and Progressives agreed to run a single candidate as an independent and have both parties back that candidate with their own resources, I think that would be a fair and reasonable approach. It would take some real coalition work to do so and it wouldn't be easy, but I could get behind a member of either party who was willing to wage a serious challenge to Douglass from the left, provided that candidate did the *real* work of spending some time courting both Democrats *and* Progressives.
Alternately, the parties themselves could meet together and put resources into recruiting a candidate acceptable to both.
We talk about finding some way to create a coalition party (i.e., Progressive Democrat party or some such thing) and while that's plausible, that sounds like a decade-long process. If we truly want to go that way, we can, but I'd like to see us focus on finding some way to deal with the Governor's race in 2010 and finding a serious challenger to Douglas that we can all agree is a decent choice.
In the meantime, I have one suggestion about IRV: let's bundle it with something Douglass really wants: try to get a bill passed which mandates IRV but also one that provides for a 4-year Governor's term to begin with 2012. I know a lot of people aren't fond of 4-year terms, but I think they actually allow a governor to get something done. If we have IRV, it might be an opportunity for the gov to get things we *want* done. There could even be a clause that triggers a special election in two years if the governor fails to get 50% of the vote. I.e., 4 year terms with a full majority, two year terms with a plurality.
Thoughts? Comments? The throwing of rotten fruits and vegetables?
Sunday, October 12
Friday, July 11
Notice the webbing near the nest: hummingbirds use spider webs to build and reinforce their nests. I'd heard this before, but never actually seen it.
As usual, clicking on the photo brings you to a larger version.
Sunday, July 6
Wednesday, June 18
I go through these days when I just can't think of anything particularly meaningful to post that hasn't been said already. I'm into all the political stuff that's going on, and I'm reading, but my brain just can't think of anything relevant to add. Sometimes, on days like this, I do photo diaries, usually of birds or of light drawings.
Today, I thought, maybe I should do something about butterflies.
I do a lot of birding, but sometimes (actually, kind of often) things can get quiet while birding and I'll notice interesting insects. Fortunately, my camera allows me to get decent insect photography as well. While I don't know much at all about insects, I do know I enjoy photographing them. After the fold is a mixture of butterfly and moth pictures, many of which I've managed to identify (with help), but some of which I haven't.
*Note*: these are smaller versions of the photos, all of which are hotlinks to the larger version. The links also frequently tell you what kind of camera I was using when I took the photo and if it's my primary lens, they've got a "Sigma 50-500mm" tag added. That's the lens I use for most wildlife photography and is very flexible in the field.
My primary camera is a Pentax K20d, but some of these were taken with earlier models (*ist, K100D, K10d). That said, here are the butterflies:
This photo is of a mystery butterfly. I don't know what it is, but I'd appreciate any help. It was taken at Parker River Wildlife Refuge in early October of 2007:
This is a pair of white admirals, which found something it liked on the ground near our campsite a few years back.
This is an atlantis frittilary from Woodford, VT from two years ago:
This is Tiger Swallowtail from our garden, taken while I was still using a 35mm camera:
This Common wood nymph also came from Parker River Wildlife Refuge, from August of 2006:
This Black Swallowtail showed up while we were up on Putney Mountain watching hawk migration a couple years ago:
This red admiral showed up in our gardens one day:
This mystery moth was in our gardens last year:
This Milbert's Tortoiseshell was flitting around while we were looking for obscure sparrows this weekend. No obscure sparrows, but nice butterfly:
This is a Silver-Spotted Skipper from our gardens:
This Great Spangled Frittilary was in a spot we found while driving around the Island Pond area in Northeastern Vermont:
This creature showed up while we were looking for unusual birds in Kennebunk, ME a few weeks ago:
And, to close, one more photo of a Monarch Butterfly:
Wednesday, June 4
This isn't a confession. I'm not ashamed of my choice and I'm not going to apologize for it. But things have changed, and they've changed in ways that I don't know that I can fully articulate, though I think most of us know. If I'd lived in a swing state, I probably would have voted for Gore, but in Vermont I had the luxury of making a protest vote. The electoral college map wasn't going to change. Vermont was going to go for Gore no matter what I did. If I'd lived in Florida, Ohio, New Mexico or New Hampshire, I would have voted for Gore. I didn't have to make that choice.
For those of you in Vermont, the first few paragraphs that follow will be familiar to you. For those of you who don't, you'll learn some very strange things about the way we choose a governor.
To explain this a little further, I didn't cast a protest vote in our Governor's race. [Warning: obscure Vermont political rules follow]. In Vermont, we had a 3-way race between Howard Dean who, at the time, was a bit of a weak Democrat (I like him a lot better now, which is a whole other story), and he was running against a right wing loon (Ruth Dwyer) and Anthony Pollina, who was a lot more openly left-wing than Dean was. I wanted to vote for Pollina, but Vermont's got odd rules. If any candidate for Governor doesn't meet the 50% vote threshold, it gets kicked to the legislature, and there was a good chance we were going to end up with a Republican legislature: it was the election right after civil unions were enacted, and there was a short-lived right-wing backlash which lasted a single election cycle before reversing itself.
So there was this genuine risk that if Dean got 49.7% of the vote, we could end up with Ruth Dwyer as governor and I thought that as much as I liked Pollina, I just couldn't take that risk. So I voted for Dean. He got just over 50%, and I'm glad. The second place (Dwyer) got around 35%, so yeah: good choice.
And I think that, given what I knew and understood at the time, both Dean and Nader were, in Vermont, good choices. It wasn't because I liked Nader. I've met Nader. He's a jerk and a bit of a self-aggrandizing fool. I was voting for the Green Party, which I'd previously respected a great deal. Now it's a bit of a joke, which sometimes happens to political parties.
You might ask why I had such trouble voting for Gore.
The answer is really simple: the death penalty.
I have serious problems supporting any candidate who supports the death penalty. This is a major problem for me, and still continues to be one. It gave me trouble when I was supporting Dean in 2004, and it continues to give me trouble with just about every candidate I come to support. Very few of them are anti-death penalty and I find that unconscionable.
But I have to let it go, for one specific reason: it's far better to have a candidate who supports the death penalty than to have one who supports the death penalty and will help to overturn Roe v. Wade.
It's infinitely better to have either Clinton or Obama than to have McCain on just about any issue you can measure, whether or not any of these candidates support the death penalty.
It's so much better to have a Democrat in the White House than to have McCain in the White House.
In 2004, when I was a bit disgusted with Kerry, I voted for him. I didn't make a protest vote. I wasn't happy with him being the choice, but I accepted the choice of one of the weaker candidates, and let it go. I wasn't happy with the way he slimed Dean, and I wasn't happy with all sorts of things he did. I even refused to work for his campaign, though I did work for anti-Bush groups.
But he got my vote.
I don't think I even have that much luxury any longer. I don't think I can sit this next election out and only cast a vote. I don't think Obama is the best choice we could have made for a nominee, but I don't think Clinton is either.
I voted for Nader in 2000, and I'm not sorry about that, but I'm not voting for a non-viable candidate again.
I didn't work for Kerry in 2004, and I'm not sorry about that, but I'm not sitting back and letting other people do all the work this time. I don't have the luxury to sit this election out and let it go without my involvement. And this goes even if Clinton manages to pull off some sort of insane upset at the convention. Would I be angry? Oh yeah.
But I'd still work for her campaign.
I am going to do what I can to take down McCain and take down every last vestige of this sewer of an administration. There's a really big cesspool in D.C. right now. It's time we clean up all the toxic runoff that's coming from Crawford.
It's going to take a long time, and we all need to see to it that this clean-up effort starts today.
Tuesday, June 3
First, I've got a show coming up in Pliny Park in Brattleboro on Saturdy, July 12th; it's an evening gig from 7-9pm.
Second, my music's on Rhapsody now. If you're a subscriber, all you have to do is play my tunes from time to time and I get automatically paid for the listen; doesn't cost you anything extra, but it earns some extra income for me.
Also: all four of my CD's are now on iTunes and amazon.com; there are links to purchase them from the web site (http://juliewaters.com/home.php) and if you click on "audio stream" you can play through short clips of all the songs available.
I'm having a real resurgence in music and musical creativity. I'm going to find time this July to complete a new CD, doing digital release only.
For the first time, ever, I'm thinking about the musical choices in terms of financial return. It's not that I'm going to play music I don't care for, but I can see which of the pieces I've sold on iTunes were most popular and which ones haven't really sold at all. And it helps that the top selling song of mine on iTunes (my rendition of the Bach Minuet) happens to be one of my favorite pieces I've ever developed.
So I think I'm going to make the next CD all in that same vein: taking classical and traditional pieces (Bach, Beethoven, for certain, and probably some old folk tunes) and perform them in my own very unique style. It's the work I do which seems most likely to generate sales, but it;s also some of the work I genuinely love.
Good to check in with everyone again. Hope you're all well!
Upcoming events for Julie Waters
Sunday, June 15th 2nd Sundays Song Circle (tentative) at RAMP Gallery; Bellows Falls, VT
Saturday, July 12th Julie Live Jam at Pliny Park; Brattleboro, VT
Sunday, July 13th 2nd Sundays Song Circle (tentative) at RAMP Gallery; Bellows Falls, VT
Sunday, August 10th 2nd Sundays Song Circle (tentative) at RAMP Gallery; Bellows Falls, VT
Sunday, June 1
crossposted to Birding New EnglandLocated on Plum Island, MA, Parker River Wildlife Refuge is, by far, one of my favorite places to bird. It's not just that there's a huge variety of birds, but that it's very uncommon to find nothing of interest during a visit and so many of the regulars who bird there are willing to share their information readily with other birders.
Take, for example, this american woodcock on her nest:
There is no possible way I would have found this nest without help from a fellow birder (Nancy Landry, who has some very nice shots of all sorts of birds on the Island), who, a couple days after my photo was taken, got a photo of the mother woodcock with the hatched young right next to her.
After the fold I'll be presenting a photojournal of various birds I've seen at Parker River, along with some of my favorite experiences there.
Please note: almost every photograph here is a clickable link to larger versions of the same photo, with details that often include type of camera, type of lens, settings, etc.
Warblers and other small perching birdsWarblers, are by far, among the hardest birds to photograph in the wild. They range from small to teensy, and like to hang out in bushes and trees, which are often leafed out so as to render them virtually invisible. And yet, still, sometimes I get fortunate. Take for example, these two birds: a black-throated green warbler and a black-throated blue:
The first of these birds was easy. There was a flock of them hanging out in the trees overhead and I just kept taking photos and kept the best of the bunch. The second was an immense amount of work. There were several warblers on the boardwalk trail (near Goodno woods) bouncing all over the place. I was excited to see a black-throated blue, as I'd never gotten a good photo of a male before, but it kept itself behind branches, twigs, never allowing a clean shot of it. But, eventually, persistence paid off and it presented itself with a clean clear view.
Other small perching birds I've seen at the refuge include manypalm warblers, Ruby Crowned Kinglets, a blue-gray gnatcatcher and a savannah sparrow:
Duck-like birdsYou get a wide variety of duck-like birds at the refuge. One of the best photos I ever got there was of these
brants, which are small, dark geese, fighting over a piece of seaweed:
Another favorite, however, was this very close sighting of a
Northern Pintails are, during migration season, plentiful on the refuge:
But perhaps high on this list is this pied-billed grebe, which took me a few days of dedicated searching to find this close to shore:
Wading birds, big and smallBeing on a migration path, the refuge can yield some really nice shorebirds of various sorts. Clicking on the photos will give you larger versions with info about the specific birds in the photos:
And finally, this whimbrel:
And to conclude, a mimic
This Brown Thrasher was making all sorts of noise, but it took me some time to track it down. I finally set the camera on auto-focus and managed to get it properly set up, but it took real work:
Sunday, May 25
Note: every photo on this page is a clickable link to a larger version of the photoThis week, we took a few days to do some birding in Maine, staying in Wells and visiting a few nearby areas. Some of our best looks were at Warblers, like this Chestnut-sided warbler, but we also had great looks at some other birds, including two new life birds.
Our primary place to bird was Laudholm Trust, a great spot for finding all sorts of warblers, as well as Eastern Towhees, thrushes and, apparently, a porcupine.
Wells Beach, on the other hand, can give great looks at a variety of birds, such as this surf scoter, and this pair of horned grebes (the first I've ever seen).
Day one started off with a walk through Laudholm Trust, which yielded several species of warblers, including the black and white warbler shown here. We also spotted a porcupine, and a trip to the Wells Beach later in the evening resulted in my first ever sighting of horned grebes and this really nice look at a Surf Scoter.
The next morning we did a walk on the Marginal Way. We thought it would yield nice warblers (as it did last year), but no such luck. Afterwards, we went to Scarborough Marsh, and didn't see a lot (again, last year, it had a lot to offer, but this time it was quieter).
Another walk through Laudholm Trust didn't yield much birdwise, but it did get us another great look at the porcupine we'd seen sleeping the day before.
The next day was the really great day. The morning's extensive walk through Laudholm yielded two species of thrush (Veery and Hermit Thrush) as well as some great warblers and a bobolink:
The afternoon included a trip to Fort Foster Park in Kittery, which gave me my third thrush of the day, a Wood Thrush and a scarlet tanager.
The next morning involved another quick walk through Laudholm, which gave me some great looks at the Eastern Towhee pictured here, another look at a Veery, a look at a bird we haven't been able to ID yet (and have no photo of so I don't know why I'm even mentioning it except it was frustrating), a Magnolia Warbler, more chestnut-sideds and a black and white warbler.
After packing up we decided to swing by Kennebunk Plains on the way home, in the hopes of spotting two life birds: a grasshopper sparrow (no) and an Upland Sandpiper (YES!).
The Upland Sandpiper was a treat because we were just about to walk to another part of the plains when we heard this very odd sounding bird call, then land. We moved close enough to get a look at it. I was sure it was an upland sandpiper primarily because I know the look and call of just about every other sandpiper in that bird's size range that we'd be likely to see in New England and it didn't fit any of them, so that was cool. Looking at Peterson's after the fact verified that we were right about the I.D.
We also managed to spot some vesper sparrows, along with a Pine Warbler and a small flock of prairie warblers (see photo on right) which were moving around like crazy and not easy to photograph, but I still managed to pull them off.
So, no grasshopper sparrow, but still, a day with a new life bird was cool, and it's not like it's as easy for me to find new life birds as it was two years ago.
All in all, this was a great trip: lots of good walks, some extremely good looks at very small birds, some great views of two new life birds and some pretty amazing looks at birds we've seen before.